Sunday 6 August 2006

Bard Wired Big Day Out

A group of principals & lead teachers had a day out to visit other Taranaki Schools. We went to Manaia Primary School to observe the use of Smart Boards in the classroom and then to Opunake Primary School to look at Curriculum Integration.

At Manaia, Principal Allan Forsyth had used a terms sabbatical study grant to write an EDI proposal to develop a school wide Information Literacy programme. His proposal can be found on Leadspace. The EDI proposal was successful and very generous allowing for (amongst other things) the purchase of 8 SmartBoard in the school - one in each classroom & one in the library.

Prior to introducing IWB to classrooms, Manaia had been very well resourced with a new server, networking & computer lab funded by WITT for a Community Education computer course. A number of other schools have hosted WITT community ed. Computer courses but none were as well resourced to do this – maybe because those schools already had good existing services… What a bonus for a school to have all of this provided. The school itself is looking really mint with alterations to buildings – corridors, computer lab, admin, staff room & hall looking great – though classrooms themselves seemed to have no major changes and were your traditional school work spaces. Staff at Manaia have all participated in InfoLink this year and follow the action learning model school-wide, they have had training in the use of the Smart Boards & provide their own just-in-time PD and sharing . SmartBoards are handy tools, to organize your lessons, pull in a range of resources, record & store your learning notes as you go (through lesson annotations), display visual images and I sure would like one when I get back into a classroom but in themselves they don’t really change what happens in a classroom – they just deliver the same stuff but differently. To be honest, I found what I expected to in all of the classrooms – nothing out of the ordinary, no innovations apart from some very nice gear around the place :-) Manaia, like all our schools are on a learning journey, with a lot of the same ingredients: whole school focus on a learning model (in this case Action Learning), Literacy contract, NUMPA, ATOL – what is their vision for learning and how will the great resources in the school support this? They are first steps on this journey and there is a lot of potential to be realized here. It will be interesting to visit again in another year and see how they are progressing. Thank you Alan for sharing your school’s experience with us :-)

So
me great artwork @ Manaia Primary (more pics on Flickr)


Opunake Primary School was everything I expected it to be - some great things happening here with Integrated Curriculum. Numeracy & Literacy is taught separately but all other curriculum areas are fully integrated. Lorraine began implementing an integrated curriculum at Opunake a few years ago in response to the needs of the kids many of them who were not engaged in their learning & as she said 'sick of doing worksheets'. They were involved in a CI research project along with Eltham Primary School last year and this year are the lead school in an EHSAS contract. Wow, does Lorraine walk the talk, driving learning in her school with passion and commitment. Before we had an opportunity to visit classrooms, Lorraine walked us through the nuts & bolts of how Curriculum Integration works at Opunake Primary School - an overview: CI @ Opunake is - based on student questions/interest; related to real life as often as possible; hands on learning; co-operative learning; Thinking Skills; Habits of Mind; Whole school/ including the community & Evolving. Towards the end of every term the school has an open day to share their learning with the wider community - i visited one a few years ago - awesome - well worth going out of your way to see. Thanks Lorraine for hosting us :-)

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hi Rachel,

I have been talking about IWB with Graham on his Teaching Generation Z Blog and by email - I think the following comment is relevant to your observation that "in themselves they don't really change what happens in the classroom" - because there is some evidence that they do change what happens in the classroom and it may not be the sort of change that you are looking for ...

- Dear Graham - have been puzzling over IWB for a while now - there is a lot of pressure on the schools I work with to keep up with edu_game and purchase these.

One of the teachers in our ict_pd cluster in New Zealand has just completed a thesis for her Masters of Education Honours degree at Massey University entitled - Innovative technologies and their use in teaching and learning: A primary teacher’s year long journey into teaching and learning with an interactive whiteboard.

Her literature review is quite telling in terms of valorising claims being heavily based on anecdotal reporting from teachers and pupils and the failure of the research to date “to distinguish between the broader benefits of presentation technologies and any specific unique advantage of an IWB, thus making it difficult to make any valid claims about the technologies overall impact.

She loved IWB’s and is what I would describe as an expert or master teacher using them with kids BUT she did find one significant challenge to educators that is not reported in the reserach media - is the the one you allude to Graham - the negative effects of “engagement” on student learning - the lengthy time students spend gazing at the screen - her comment “did we all become slaves in term one?” This is something she worked hard to overcome but she found that IWT can and do impact negatively on co-constructivist teaching approaches.

We need to do a lot more thinking about IWB and what unique advantage they offer over other presentation technologies like data projector and laptop and graphics tablet etc before we rush into mass spend ups and implementation in education. And we need to think about presentation technologies and what they do to pedagogy - to rescue us from that enticing BPB educational game.

Regards Artichoke

PS Must be the season for ict_pd playing away from home - one of our clusters is on the road this morning visiting and critiquing ict integration in schools of their choice - then meeting this afternoon to make SWOT presentations on their new thinking and learning to share with cluster schools.

Rachel Whalley said...

Yep i have also touched base with Graham about this too - in regard to IWB vs Dataprojectors & he comments at length further back somewhere (will link in my nxt blog post). I know what u are talking about as far as 'engagement' - my sister reflects on her teaching experience in the UK where the teachers loved IWB because they were a great management tool - keeping all eyes on the action up front. Perhaps the term 'engagement' needs to be clarified (as u talk in a recent comment on 'what is learning') What is engagement? Being involved in what the teacher wants you to be involved in? Not being 'off task' Whose learning is this?

Anonymous said...

Ahh good point Rachel - talk about "engagement" is much like talk about "underachievement" - both are value laden - "in the eye of the beholder" stuff.

James Delisle is my favourite thinkier on this one - he introduces the notion of "selective consumers" into discussions on underachievment - which would fit the engagement debate as well

"The best description I ever heard of the word "lazy" is "people who are not motivated in ways you want them to be." This same description could also be given to the word "underachievement," one of the most overused and misapplied terms used in our field.

Reams of articles and books have been written on the "problem" of underachievement and its resolution but, with one notable exception - Joanne Rand Whitmore's Giftedness, Conflict, and Underachievement, now, sadly, out of print - most of the remaining work on this topic is vapid, void of either substance or respect, and filled with techniques to coerce "underachieving" students into performing at levels that cause adults to smile. While pretending to have the best interests of underachievers at heart, authors on this topic do their best to zap out of these often creative children the very essence of what has kept them alive, intellectually speaking: their nonconformity and their refusal to accept mediocrity in their education.